JD Supra

USPTO Proposes Rule That Could Impact IPR Challenges

§ 42.108(d) Required stipulation for efficiency: The Board will not institute or maintain IPR unless the petitioner stipulates that it will not pursue invalidity challenges under §§ 102 or 103 in any ...
JD Supra

USPTO’s Proposed “One and Done” IPR Rule: Rethinking Finality, Fairness, and Efficiency

The USPTO’s recently published notice of proposed rulemaking (RIN 0651-AD89, Docket No. PTO-P-2025-0025) for inter partes review (IPR) proceedings seeks to curb multiple IPR challenges to the same ...

Stronger IPR will drive next phase of India–Denmark ties: Envoy Rasmus A Kristensen

In a chat on IPR, India-Denmark trade relations, Denmark's envoy to India Rasmus A Kristensen says his country can serve as a ...
Reuters

IPR tricks of the trade: evolving standards for stipulations to avoid discretionary denial

July 13, 2023 - Inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are frequent components of patent litigation disputes. As part of a defense strategy, a party ...
Reuters

Section 112 concerns in an IPR at institution and final written decision

November 9, 2023 - An inter partes review (IPR) can only challenge claims of an issued patent on anticipation or obviousness grounds, under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, based on patents or printed ...
IPWatchdog

Which Invalidity Avenue to Take: Inter Partes Review Versus Post-Grant Review

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides invalidity tools via inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR), but which route is better? One may consider important factors ...