Immigration Matters is a recurring series by César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández that analyzes the court’s immigration docket, highlighting emerging legal questions about new policy and enforcement practices.

Supreme Court memos obtained by the New York Times reveal a fierce ideological battle over blocking Obama's Clean Power Plan on the emergency docket.

For more than 200 years, it has worked at a slow and deliberate pace, weighing written briefs and oral arguments. The justices listen, read, discuss, vote and write detailed opinions and dissents that explain their thinking.

President Donald Trump has lashed out at the conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court in a wild rant ahead of another potentially humiliating legal defeat. Speaking to CNBC on Tuesday, the president embarked on an angry tirade against the court—including the justices “nominated by me”—accusing them of lacking “common sense” on tariffs and asking “bad questions” about his immigration policies.

Speculation has increased over whether the justice, who joined the court in 2006, will retire following a book about his career.

The Supreme Court has long presented itself as a uniform group of justices, all sheathed in long black robes. Its rulings are the product of a collective majority. And when justices refer to a precedent,

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has rebuked her colleagues in a scathing solo dissent, claiming that she “cannot fathom” the majority’s decision. The rebuke centered on a case that addressed whether a police officer breached the Fourth Amendment by stopping a person without reasonable suspicion.

By Andrew Chung April 20 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a bid by parents to sue a public school district in Massachusetts over actions by teachers and officials to support the gender identity of students by not disclosing name or pronoun changes to parents without the child's consent.

The Supreme Court turned away a legal battle testing whether a public school violates parents' rights when it encourages their child's social gender transition without their knowledge or consent.

A former Supreme Court clerk compared Kagan to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in a new book.